The evidence
The Harlot and the Ten Kings: My Reading of Revelation 17
The woman who rides the beast, the kings who give it their power, and the day they turn on her: what I see, how confident I am, and why I may be wrong.
Home › The Evidence › Revelation 17
✓ Reviewed by Fr. John How this site is made
Revelation 17 is the key John gives to his own visions: "Here is a clue for one who has wisdom" (17:9). It is also the chapter where readings of Revelation have most often gone wrong. I hold everything on this page with less confidence than the marks of chapter 13, and I name no one as the harlot. Words and deeds are weighed here, never souls (CCC 1861).
1. The harlot who rides the beast
The text. "The great harlot who lives near the many waters. The kings of the earth have had intercourse with her" (17:1–2). She rides "a scarlet beast that was covered with blasphemous names, with seven heads and ten horns," and she is "drunk on the blood of the holy ones" (17:3, 6). The waters are "peoples, nations, and tongues" (17:15), and she is "the great city that has sovereignty over the kings of the earth" (17:18). "The merchants of the earth grew rich from her drive for luxury" (18:3), "all nations were led astray by your magic potion" (18:23, in Greek pharmakeia), and her cargo ends with "slaves, that is, human beings" (18:13).
My reading. For John's readers the harlot was Rome, rich and idolatrous. In our time I read her as the global digital and financial economy carried by American power: a "city" without walls, where the peoples of the earth gather, that rules the kings, enriches its merchants, and leads the nations astray with something very like a potion. I name no company as the harlot; I take the great technology platforms, Meta and the makers of artificial intelligence among them, as leading examples of what she is. She rides the beast: she is carried by its power for a time. I grade this possible.
The blood of the holy ones. She is "drunk on the blood of the holy ones and on the blood of the witnesses to Jesus" (17:6), and at her fall "in her was found the blood of prophets and holy ones and all who have been slain on the earth" (18:24). As in card 7, I read the holy ones as the Catholic Church, all Christians, and all who keep God's commandments, and I include here all people of faith. The Church teaches that the plan of salvation includes those who acknowledge the Creator, "in the first place amongst whom are the Muslims," and all who seek God sincerely (CCC 841–843).
The evidence.
- The blood of people of faith. In Myanmar, where hatred against the Rohingya, a Muslim people, spread on Facebook before the violence of 2017, the head of the UN fact-finding mission said social media played a "determining role" (Al Jazeera).
- Sovereignty over the kings. The platforms shape elections and governments. In Myanmar, as above, and in the words of the UN investigator Yanghee Lee, "I'm afraid that Facebook has now turned into a beast, and not what it originally intended" (Al Jazeera). Frontline's The Facebook Dilemma (2018) set out its role in elections and conflicts from the Philippines to Ukraine and the United States (PBS).
- Merchants grown rich, nations led by a potion. An economy built on capturing attention, and algorithms designed to be hard to resist.
- Riding the beast. At the 2025 inauguration eight business leaders sat on the dais, the heads of Meta, Amazon, Google and Tesla in front of the incoming Cabinet (AP, via WSLS). On December 11, 2025, an executive order overrode state AI laws for "one central source of approval," a direction OpenAI, Google and Meta favored (GV Wire).
- A new Babel. Pope Leo XIV sets before our age the choice "either to construct a new Tower of Babel or to build the city in which God and humanity dwell together," and warns that "the main drivers of development are private, often transnational, parties" (Magnifica Humanitas 5, 7; OSV News).
A reflection, not evidence. In the opening of Frontline's documentary, the interviewer, touring Facebook's first office, asks about a picture on the wall: "the lady riding a pit bull" (transcript). It was probably one of the murals the artist David Choe painted for that office in 2005 (KQED). Nothing suggests he had Revelation 17 in mind. I note it only because it struck me.
The case against.
- The harlot is a city, and the Church's first reading is Rome. A system without walls fits "city" only by analogy, and no single company fits it at all.
- Revelation 17:6 names "the holy ones" and "the witnesses to Jesus," which most readers take as Christian martyrs; reading it of all people of faith rests on 18:24 and on my wider reading of the holy ones. And a platform's part in violence it did not intend, as in Myanmar, is not the same as a city that kills the saints.
- The platforms and AI also do great good, and the Church calls for technology to be governed, not condemned.
Would strengthen: the digital economy turned against the Church and her witnesses; its power over governments made open. Would weaken: its power checked and turned to the common good. Standing: unfolding.
2. The ten kings
The text. "The ten horns that you saw represent ten kings who have not yet been crowned; they will receive royal authority along with the beast for one hour. They are of one mind and will give their power and authority to the beast. They will fight with the Lamb, but the Lamb will conquer them" (17:12–14). In Daniel a little horn rises among ten (Daniel 7:8, 24).
My reading. I hold this open. Any reading must fit six things: kings not yet crowned; authority with the beast for "one hour"; one mind; their power given to the beast; war with the Lamb; and in the end their turning on the harlot. [Not graded.]
How the Church's readers took them. St. Irenaeus, St. Cyril and Lactantius read ten kings rising at the same time from the breakup of Rome, among whom the last enemy rises (Against Heresies V.26.1; Catechetical Lecture 15.12; Divine Institutes VII.16). St. Hippolytus says Daniel's ten toes are "equivalent to (so many) democracies" (On Christ and Antichrist 27). St. Augustine warns that the Antichrist "may come unexpectedly while there are not ten kings living," and asks whether ten "signifies the whole number of kings who are to precede his coming" (City of God XX.23). The NABRE note reads them first as "perhaps Parthian satraps." Modern attempts to count them, as ten European nations or ten world regions, have mostly failed.
Three candidates I am weighing.
- The Board of Peace. He chairs it, with a veto and control of its agenda and membership, and an official said he may keep the chair "until he resigns it"; some 27 nations are founding members (card 8 on The First Beast). It fits "one mind" and power given; it does not fit "not yet crowned," since its members already rule, or the number ten, unless ten is symbolic.
- The powers of wealth and technology. Kings without crowns: power over billions without a throne. At the 2025 inauguration the heads of the great technology companies sat on the dais before the Cabinet. "One hour" may fit how short some of those alliances proved.
- Augustine's ten: all the powers that will stand with the beast, whoever they are.
The case against. Revelation 17 is the graveyard of confident readings. A number that may be symbolic cannot be fitted to a list, and every candidate here fails at least one of the six details.
3. Three humbled
The text. In Daniel, as the little horn rises, "three of the previous horns were uprooted before it" (Daniel 7:8); "he shall lay low three kings" (7:24). St. Hippolytus names them "the three kings of Egypt, and Libya, and Ethiopia, whom he cuts off in the array of battle" (On Christ and Antichrist 25), and Lactantius three "who shall then be in possession of Asia" (Divine Institutes VII.16).
What I watch. In 2026 two rulers fell by American action: Venezuela's president was seized on January 3, and Iran's Supreme Leader was killed in the strikes of February 28 (cards 2 and 8 on The First Beast). Cuba has been under an American fuel blockade since January 2026, and in March the administration told it that its president "has to go"; as of mid-2026 he remained in power (Wikipedia summary). I watch Cuba; I do not predict. [Not graded.]
The case against. In Daniel the three are horns among the ten, uprooted as the little horn rises, and the rest then submit. Venezuela and Iran were adversaries, not kings who had given him their power.
4. The kings turn on her
The text. "The ten horns that you saw and the beast will hate the harlot; they will leave her desolate and naked; they will eat her flesh and consume her with fire. For God has put it into their minds to carry out his purpose" (17:16–17). Yet "the kings of the earth who had intercourse with her" weep at her burning (18:9), and her merchants mourn (18:11).
My reading. If the harlot is the digital and financial economy, Revelation foretells the day when the powers that rode with her turn on her: governments that seize, break up or shut down the platforms and artificial intelligence, perhaps after some disaster, while those who grew rich from her mourn. [Not graded.]
A strange agreement. Peter Thiel holds that whoever moves to stop artificial intelligence is the Antichrist: "the antichrist is a luddite who wants to stop all science" (Gizmodo). He and I would recognize the same event, powers turning on technology, and disagree on who the beast is.
The case against. The Church does not call for AI to be burned but governed, for the dignity of the person, justice and labor (Pope Leo XIV, May 10, 2025). And I must not use artificial intelligence twice: if it belongs to the harlot, it cannot also be the image that speaks (card 10 on The Second Beast) without care.
What Scripture reveals: The Harlot and the Scarlet Beast on The First Beast · How this reading is weighed: Revelation 17 on Apocalypse 13